Developing Web Product Exam How to get a better mark!

1. Read through and highlight the exam questions
2. The banner needs to be the full width but not height of the page and include the logo and another image and saved as a PNG and make sure it is less than 250kb
3. Include a footer if required also
4. Make sure all images are correct for the scenario if the web page is on ice cream don't put pictures of tress into it!
5. If any images have writing please ensure that the writing is easily readable not too small
6. Link the pages as instructed with the exam paper
7. Link to email need to be mail to
8. Link to external websites need http://
9. Add rollover images image same size on both sides
10. Add hot spots if required
11. Convert all film to mp4 or m4v format
12. Use text box and Hex colour to follow brief and instructions
13. Web Page must fit on screen no sideways scrolling!
14. Don't just copy text add titles, sub titles, bold, italics, white space use colour palettes, change text size
15. Use a white or a cream background which is easy to read black text on
16. Edit the images that you use don't just insert what you are given crop or make a montage
17. Edit and add to the text you are given and lay it out including presentational features such as headings and sub headings, bullets, emboldened text, coloured backgrounds and varied the font, font size and colour
18. Don't use the standard fonts but something different but that is easy to read
19. Whatever layout you use do the same to all pages
20. Suggest possible improvements to your website and explain how these would enhance the outcome
21. Don't just describe what you have done in your evaulation but why
22. Include reference to the audience and purpose of the site why you made the decisions you did
23. Make sure you complete the Alt text when inserting images
24. Take Print screens of what you have done to help accessibility to your website and put them into your evaluation

CIDA - Web Exam Revision Jan 2018

Exam Advice

How to Guide

How to Videos


 

EdExcel Documentation

Click here to read the DA201 Unit Specification 

Web Exam Evaluation

ECDL Mock Videos

CiDA Web Seminar 2016

BURNHAM Daniel Joseph

DUFTY Amelia

MCCANN Connor

ABRAHAM Josh Richard

ADAMOPOULOS Georgios

BAKER Megan

BROGAN Lauren Marie

CHIVERS Lexie

DALLIMORE Kate

DAVIS Charlotte

DEVLIN Charlotte

EDMUNDS Joseph

ELLIS Jay Matthew

GILES Jennifer

GILLETT Bethany

GODFROY Hugo

GREENALL Brandon

HAYLES Ricky Scott

HOUNSELL Connor

HUMBY Kieran David

JAMES Joshua

KIRBY Jack Edward

MO Jacob Hin Yat

PHILLIPS Joshua Samuel

REYNOLDS Mylo

RICHMOND Daisy

ROWLEY Madelaine Victoria

RUSSELL Hannah

SAUNDERS George

SHAW Oliver Louis

SMART Samuel Michael Roger

SMITH Rhys Robert James

TOOMER Samuel George William

WILLIAMS Ryan

ALLEN Lewis

BARNES Jack

BOND Joshua Steven

BUNDAY Ellie Rose

BURT George

EYRE Savannah

LAWRENCE Lucy

LOACH Megan

LONG Megan

PICANO Bradley

RUSSELL Ethan Craig

SIMMONS William David Lewis

CROMPTON Harvey

HOUGHTON Elise

LACEY Robert James

ANDREWS Isaac

WILCOCK James

FRITH Martyn

JORDAN-WELLSTEAD Joshua

ROBERTS Elizabeth

LYS George

ICT & Computer Science ESPs Spring 2016

CiDA Web Exam Tomorrow

Website Exam Evaluation

The magic formula for passing the web exam was the web exam evaluation? 

Might be overkill, but it's 6 marks you could easily be getting! 

Click here for help

Where are the marks feedback from exams taken in 2015?

Although in the main students made a valid justification for their choice of colour scheme, once again, only a minority of students made valid justifications for a range of design decisions. Students need to be encouraged to evaluate the effectiveness of the final product and justify their design decisions in relation to the intended audience and purpose. 

Students should also suggest possible improvements to their website and explain how these enhancements would improve the outcome. Too often, students were still describing what they had done in the exam and listing the client’s requirements that they had not met as future improvements. 

In general, very few students included references to audience and purpose in their evaluations and it is clear that students require considerably more support and guidance if they are going to be able to meet the Level 3 assessment criteria for this assessment strand.

Add printscrren to show what you are talking about

Web Exam Top Tips

Click here for top tips

CiDA Web Exam Guide

NG CIDA - Developing Web Products Exam

Exam Advice

How to Guide

How to Videos


 


EdExcel Documentation

Click here to read the DA201 Unit Specification 

CiDA Web Exam Revision Sessions Friday 8th Jan 2016

Surname	Forename	Revision Session Teacher	Room	Period
Abraham	Josh	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Adamopoulos	Georgios	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Allen	Lewis	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Andrews	Isaac	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Baker	Megan	P.Rymill	679	Pd 3 - 5
Barnes	Jack	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Bartlett	Paige	M.Smith	675	Pd 1-2
Beecheno	Georgia	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Bolton	Joseph	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Bond	Joshua	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Brewster	Chloe	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Brogan	Lauren	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Bunday	Ellie	P.Rymill	679	Pd 3 - 5
Burt	George	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Buttle	Lewis	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Byrne	Olivia	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Challis	Daniella	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Chivers	Lexie	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Clapson	Ella	M.Smith	675	Pd 1-2
Clark	Lucy	M.Smith	675	Pd 1-2
Clarkin	Nathan	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Crompton	Harvey	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Dallimore	Kate	M.Smith	675	Pd 1-2
Davis	Charlotte	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Devlin	Charlotte	M.Smith	675	Pd 1-2
Easterby	Penny	P.Rymill	679	Pd 1-2
Edmunds	Joseph	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Ellis	Jay	M.Smith	675	Pd 1-2
Ellison	Christopher	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Evans	Molly	M.Smith	675	Pd 1-2
Eyre	Savannah	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Foreman	James	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Frith	Martyn	M.Knight	566	Pd 1-2
Giles	Jennifer	M.Smith	675	Pd 1-2
Giles	Lewis	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Gillett	Bethany	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Godfroy	Hugo	P.Rymill	679	Pd 1-2
Greenall	Brandon	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Gregory	Chloe	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Hayles	Ricky	P.Rymill	679	Pd 3 - 5
Hinton	Emiley	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Houghton	Elise	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Hounsell	Connor	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Humby	Kieran	P.Rymill	679	Pd 3 - 5
Ito	Alyssa	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
James	Joshua	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Jerram	Samuel	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Jordan-Wellstead	Joshua	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Kendall	Billy	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Kirby	Jack	P.Rymill	679	Pd 3 - 5
Lacey	Robert	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Lawler	Nicole	P.Rymill	679	Pd 3 - 5
Lawrence	Lucy	P.Rymill	679	Pd 3 - 5
Loach	Megan	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Long	Megan	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Marcos	Guilherme	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Martinez	Brandon	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Mitchell	Morgan	P.Rymill	679	Pd 1-2
Mo	Jacob	P.Rymill	679	Pd 1-2
Moore	Lauren	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Moss	Shaun	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Murray	Taine	P.Rymill	679	Pd 3 - 5
Norman	Benjamin	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Peacock	Olivia	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Pepper	Craig	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Phillips	Joshua	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Picano	Bradley	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Ravenscroft	Aidan	M.Smith	675	Pd 1-2
Reynolds	Mylo	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Richmond	Daisy	P.Rymill	679	Pd 1-2
Ripper	Jade	P.Rymill	679	Pd 3 - 5
Ripper	Amber	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Ritchie-Barnes	Ellie	M.Smith	675	Pd 1-2
Roberts	Elizabeth	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Ross	Olivia	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Rowley	Madelaine	M.Smith	675	Pd 1-2
Russell	Hannah	P.Rymill	679	Pd 1-2
Russell	Ethan	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Saunders	George	P.Rymill	679	Pd 3 - 5
Saunders	Ewan	M.Smith	675	Pd 3 - 5
Scurr	Harry	P.Rymill	679	Pd 1-2
Shaw	Oliver	P.Rymill	679	Pd 1-2
Simmons	William	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Smart	Samuel	P.Rymill	679	Pd 1-2
Smith	Rhys	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Stoker	Bradley	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Strong	Harry	P.Rymill	679	Pd 1-2
Swanston	James	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Terrell	Shannon	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Thompson	Ella	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Toomer	Samuel	M.Smith	675	Pd 1-2
Tuttlebee	Eliza	P.Rymill	679	Pd 1-2
Vacher	Georgia	P.Rymill	679	Pd 3 - 5
Walker	Lewis	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Wall	Ashley	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Waller	Monique	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Waugh	Alexander	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Whistance	Oliver	M.Smith	675	Pd 1-2
Wilcock	James	M.Knight	565	Pd 1-2
Wilkinson	Eleanor	M.Knight	565	Pd 3 - 5
Williams	Aidan	P.Rymill	679	Pd 3 - 5
Williams	Ryan	P.Rymill	679	Pd 3 - 5